Hospitals push CMS to pause ‘most favored nation’ drug-pricing rule

Hospitals want CMS to pull the plug on its contentious “most favored nation” drug-pricing rule, a Trump-era demonstration that would tie Medicare outpatient drug pay to drug prices in other wealthy countries.

Providers argued the policy is illegal and wouldn’t lower drug prices or patients’ out-of-pocket costs in comments on the interim final rule due Tuesday. The American Hospital Association said it would “harm patients’ access to critical, lifesaving drugs” and create more financial problems for hospitals because “the rule places the entire onus of reducing drug prices on hospitals, rather than on drug companies or on Medicare.” Experts have said the Trump administration’s last-minute plan depends on providers negotiating drugmakers’ prices down to meet reduced payment levels.

CMS should “withdraw it immediately and replace it with a serious effort at drug pricing reform,” AHA wrote.

The rule would create the CMS Innovation Center‘s first nationwide, mandatory experiment, marking “sea change in the way … models have been adopted and implemented,” according to AHA.

Hospitals suggested CMS doesn’t have the power to carry out such a large experiment, saying the model “is not a test at all” and amounts to “the adoption of a nationwide policy for the highest expenditure drugs,” according to the Federation of American Hospitals. FAH noted that the 50 drugs included in the model make up about 80% of Medicare spending for Part B drugs.

“There is no control group that will be unaffected by the model’s impact in order to make any conclusion as to whether the intervention was successful as would occur in a conventional demonstration model,” the letter said.

According to CMS, the model would save taxpayers and beneficiaries more than $85 billion over seven years, mostly due to lower utilization. Nearly 20% of people covered by Medicare would lose access to treatment by the end of the model’s second year.

“Savings to the Medicare program should not be on the backs of beneficiaries, many of whom live on fixed incomes and already struggle with access to care. Further, this rule would codify a system of health inequities. Beneficiaries with sufficient personal resources to pay for drugs will continue to have access, while other beneficiaries will not,” the Association of American Medical Colleges wrote.

AAMC blamed other CMS policy changes for increased outpatient spending on separately payable drugs, saying that changes to the inpatient-only list and 2-midnight requirements have driven “a shift from the inpatient to outpatient setting.”

“Hospital outpatient departments and off-campus provider-based departments (PBDs) are seeing a spike in referrals of patients requiring treatment for advanced stages of disease,” the group said.

AARP didn’t comment on the rule, but conservative advocacy groups like Americans for Tax Reform aligned themselves with drugmakers, taking aim at the plan for relying on price controls to lower drug spending. ATR argued the plan would reduce access to new cures, limit pharmaceutical innovation and employment, and “move America one step closer to a government-run healthcare system.”

Groups representing drugmakers, including the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association—PhRMA—did not comment on the rule. Drugmakers successfully sued to block the model from taking effect on Jan. 1. The Biden administration is unlikely to move forward with the plan following a memo last week from White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain directing agencies to freeze new regulations that haven’t taken effect.



Source link

Blog article

New omicron variant stokes world fears, triggers travel bans

The discovery of a new coronavirus variant sent a chill through much of the world Friday as nations raced to halt air travel, markets fell sharply and scientists held emergency meetings to weigh the exact risks, which were largely unknown. A World Health Organization panel named the variant “omicron” and classified it as a highly […]

Read More
Blog article

Merck COVID pill effective, experts will review safety

Federal health regulators say an experimental COVID-19 pill from Merck is effective against the virus, but they will seek input from outside experts on risks of birth defects and other potential problems during pregnancy. The Food and Drug Administration posted its analysis of the pill ahead of a public meeting next week where academic and […]

Read More
Blog article

Supreme Court to hear 340B case that could impact all hospitals

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case seeking to reverse cuts to the 340B Drug Program next week, and the outcome could have consequences for all providers, even those who don’t access the discounted medicines. Plaintiffs including the American Hospital Association and providers that participate in the program are asking the high court […]

Read More